Comparación de precios de plataforma GRC para equipos europeos

Mid-market GRC platform licenses in Europe typically cost €45k–€120k per year before professional services and implementation. TPRM-only tools often start at €25k–€80k but rise with supplier count. Budget an additional 20–40% for onboarding, annual evidence cycles, and framework content updates. 3-year total cost of ownership is typically 1.5–2x the first-year license price.

Normalise on: entities in scope, number of frameworks, assessments per year, user count, hosting region (EU/Swiss vs US), professional services bundled or separate, and contract length. Compare 3-year TCO rather than year-one list price. Ask each vendor to quote on the same scope definition to make quotes comparable.

EU buyers frequently require Swiss or EU data residency, DORA and NIS2 framework content packs, and multi-entity structures. These factors increase scope compared to US-centric per-seat SKUs. EU-specific questionnaire libraries and EBA/ESMA reporting formats are rarely included in US base editions without an add-on purchase.

Module count (GRC, TPRM, privacy, and audit priced separately), SSO and integration costs, unlimited versus per-seat licensing, managed assessment services, EU data residency options, and framework content pack updates. Enterprise deals frequently bundle professional services at 20–40% of annual license value, which does not appear in the headline quote.

Not necessarily. A GRC platform with a substantive TPRM module avoids evidence duplication: vendor risk findings feed directly into the control register, and one assessment can simultaneously satisfy DORA Art. 30 contractual requirements and ISO 27001:2022 supplier relationship clauses. Separate tools require manual evidence synchronisation and often produce conflicting records during audits.

DORA Art. 28–44 obligations (Register of Information in EBA Annex III format, Art. 30 contractual gap analysis per contract, concentration risk monitoring, and exit strategy management) add material scope that most general TPRM tools do not support natively. Platforms with native DORA workflows include these; others charge for configuration or professional services to build them out, increasing TCO substantially.

The six most common: (1) professional services not in the headline quote (20–40% of license); (2) per-entity fees for multi-subsidiary structures; (3) annual framework content pack updates charged separately; (4) SSO and integration development costs; (5) evidence export and audit formatting modules; and (6) managed assessment services if your team lacks capacity to run questionnaire campaigns.

Per-seat pricing is predictable for small teams but expensive at scale. Per-vendor pricing fits TPRM programmes with a defined supplier list but rises with portfolio growth. Flat-fee-by-tier pricing (like Acuna's vendor-count model) is predictable regardless of user count. For regulated entities with 50–200 ICT vendors, flat-fee models typically outperform per-seat at the 2-year mark.

Most enterprise GRC platforms do not offer a self-serve free trial because configuration scope is entity-specific. Vendors typically offer a scoped proof of concept (POC) or structured demo instead. Some smaller SaaS TPRM tools offer free starter tiers but these rarely include EU data residency, DORA-specific workflows, or multi-framework control mapping.

Published pricing for the Acuna GRC platform starts at CHF 5,388 per year with no per-user fees. Supplier Shield is the TPRM module, priced as an add-on to the GRC platform. Visit the pricing page for published list tiers by vendor count. No RFP required to get a number.